RISK & RESILIENCE
Our team is quantitatively and qualitatively exploring this underserved environmental justice issue. To do so, we are analyzing a variety of environmental and economic indicators derived from open-source census and satellite data. This data, in concert with interviews and policy research, will provide our team insight into potential migratory patterns and risk. Our ultimate goal is to develop a wildfire migration risk mapping tool for inclusive, data-driven policy making that strengthens the resilience of the most vulnerable communities.
Read Our Report
Our team spent 2020 investigating the data and policies behind California wildfires. Check out our insights!
Understanding california wildfires one map at a time
WILFIRES IN CALIFORNIA IN 2020
MILLION ACRES BURNED IN 2020
UNINCORPORATED TERRITORIES (CDPs) IN CALIFORNIA
Percent OF UNINCORPORATED TERRITORIES THAT ARE LOW INCOME
BUTTE COUNTY, CA
- Unemployment rate 12.1% 12.1%
- Population 65 years or older 16.5% 16.5%
- Owner Extreme Housing Burden 20.8% 20.8%
- Voter turnout 57.2% 57.2%
- Renter High Housing Burden 62% 62%
INCLUSIVE & EQUITABLE WILDFIRE LEGISLATION
Unincorporated territories are at the front lines of California’s wildfire crisis. These underrepresented communities are often overlooked by state and federal governance and face policy inequities in wildfire prevention, response, relief, and insurance in comparison to incorporated cities. In an effort to bring a voice to these communities, the Roberts Environmental Center is developing policy toolkits to demonstrate the impacts of wildfire policies.
What Are Unincorporated Territories?
Unincorporated territories, also known as Census Designated Places (CDPs) differ from municipalities in several distinct ways, perhaps most notably in its form of governance. Unlike cities and towns, unincorporated territories do not have an official forms of local governance, and are instead governed by county commissions, boards, and councils. Under county jurisdiction, unincorporated communities tend to have greater freedom and fewer restrictions, but this comes with pros and cons. The latter are becoming more visible in light of California’s worsening wildfire seasons.
Filling in the gaps
The Process of Incorporation
Much like the path to incorporation, gaining non-profit status for small community organizations like California Fire Safe Councils is difficult, but by no means impossible. These local groups are considered “associations” in IRS tax law, and through their small status can apply using the IRS’s expedited process, officially called Form 1023-EZ, Streamlined Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. This process is arduous and requires additional registration including but not limited to applications for an Employer Identification Number, but can pave the way for different funding sources these communities may currently be missing. (I figured we can link to the IRS form or something here)
Although they represent a major voting bloc in California, the segmented and widespread members of unincorporated territories too often see their voices ignored and overlooked. Larger, more densely populated urban areas are much easier to pander to, and tend to draw the most attention at the media level. These rural communities, despite being hit the hardest by California’s increasingly fierce wildlife season, see the aid and support they desperately need wrapped in bureaucratic red tape and held out of their reach. The overwhelming demands of county and state agencies on these CDP’s in order to give them aid are gargantuan and often insurmountable. It will require both an active effort on the population of these rural regions and our elected officials at the governmental level to change the dynamics of wildfire prevention and remediation policies, and that journey starts with a single step in the right direction.
Create circular, thriving economies through biomass generation
Biomass generation facilities create a circular economy that incentivizes fire prevention efforts by utilizing hazardous forest material as inputs for profitable electricity generation. This “fuel-neutral” process makes use of resources that would otherwise be wasted – or worse – contribute to wildfire risk. Biomass generation can provide back-up sources of electricity, stimulate local economies through job creation, and contribute meaningfully to carbon neutrality goals. This green energy project has tremendous potential for minimizing wildfire risk and building community resilience…it just needs financing.
Wildfires can contribute to the flooding, erosion, and pollution of water management facilities. This threatens water quality and quantity for counties throughout California that rely on watersheds within or proximate to fire-prone areas. Wildfire mitigation and ecological recovery is in the best interest of all Californians. At present, many under-resourced unincorporated territories must foot the bill of wildfire prevention and restoration efforts, but their budgets are a fraction of what they should and could be. It’s time to call on counties who benefit from clean, running water thanks to the effort and economic expenditure of these communities to take action. Sharing the same watershed should entail sharing the same financial burden for its protection.